It's not accurate to say that Wacom have null penetration in our day to day. When I buy something online, when the packet reaches my city, there is a delivery person (from a transport business) who brings it to my home and asks me to sign in a wacom-type tablet. They never check that is my true identity, just give me the packet and check if delivered or not. Imagine that the deliverer confuses my house with the neighbours one and gives me the packet. It will be no one fault: Packet is technically delivered and you have accepted that packet. With authenticated signature you could be able to see where the problem have occurred and look for a responsible in this cases having proofs. According to the register problem we should have this on mind. This would be a service offered by one (or some) concrete business X that would allow you to have a log of your signature-involved transactions with that business X. When you use for first time one service that implements SignAuth, you would have to register your signature for first time to then, can use that service. I think that this should be optional to the user independently of X have implemented our technology, what means that (assuming that X offers this service) you have the option to track or not your signatures. Answering to Rich Radka, yes, we develop that in 24h, using mostly Python, Flask and WebGL. It's not even something impossible, because we didn't implemented a full version of our algorithm, just a simple one that compares signatures with pretty low complexity due to the lack of time. Anyway, thanks everyone for giving us your advices!

The use of a Wacom tablet was just because we wanted to experiment developing for the WILL SDK. Since we couldn't have access to such tablet we had to generate random signatures and then use the algorithm to decide whether the signature was correct or not. We did think of making a new user have to sign 3 times when he registers to have an average time per signature and signature pattern but we definitely didn't think about the barrier of needing a home/personal tablet in order to signup. Will definitely keep researching into this idea. Thanks everyone for spending your time with us and giving us such good advices :)

Signatures are going away and been replaced by Tech like blockchain. Wacom tablets hard to have/find creating a barrier to enter on the services

Your key benefit is real time alert someone is signing, work on this

Wacom null penetration at home. Just in public places or Bank faciliites. Regsitering it's hard

Seems a clunky way to solve the problem - and sign up seems impossible. If you did this with Amazon for example, it would have returns on time invested. I'm sceptical that you developed this all this weekend, Maybe I'm wrong...

Interesting problem to solve – definitely an issue that needs to be addressed. In order for this to work you would need to have a sample of the persons’ signature before they make the transaction. How will you get these signatures? This could potentially create an extra barrier in the buying process for ecommerce.